[block id=”blogads”]
(95 Likes) What can America really do about our ridiculous national debt? It seems inevitable that one day we will reach the end of our rope.
contrary to their interests. The debt crisis is a convenient “Slim Man” used by those who want to help the rich hold more money (WSJ / Heritage Foundation / National Review) or the ignorant (Tea Party). people tend to think that federal government books are like their family’s finances. Not they. However, macroeconomics is often intuitive and confusing. Thus, ordinary people—too busy to read dry economic studies—can be misled to support policies that are both self-destructive and, ironically, increase debt out of a sense of civic responsibility. The last tax bill is a perfect example. The Trump-sponsored reform was, in effect, a subsidy gift from US citizens to the richest 0.1% (especially with large gifts to real estate investors and inheritors of their wealth) How did they do it? ? They lied. They told people that corporate tax rates in the US are the highest in the world. Not they. When you look at the actual taxes paid by our companies, we are right in the middle. They told us companies would redistribute cash into the economy. The problem is that US companies already have a lot of cash. In the US, companies returned more capital to investors than they raised. History is a very good guide in these situations and tells us that companies will: Pay their senior management more (management pay is often linked to profitability) Consolidate, buy and merge (especially with more hostile mergers) and “Loosen” corporate exp (non) salary payroll). Think better offices, airplanes, perks) WalMart has put in a big effort and lost an extra $1,000 to each of its employees. I don’t want to diminish the importance of $1,000, but (a) they won’t do it again (b) the Walton family will pocket billions, and (c) share prices have gone up after the announcement. In other words, the company got good PR, the family took home an extra billion dollars, and gave its employees a few one-time gifts. And in a few years, when revenues really start to show the impact of Trump’s gift to the rich, our conservative/tea party leaders will put on their “responsible faces” and Fox News will begin to peel back stories of stereotypical welfare recipients. taxpayers. After all, we have a “spending problem” and they will cut back on education, roads, R&D, public transport… Our debt is in US dollars. The dollars we just minted. This is an important mechanism called “seniority”. Basically, it taxes people by slightly devaluing the currency they hold in cash. Who keeps cash? Most are held outside of the US and probably by some people you don’t mind paying some tax to the US. (over 65%) Greece had problems because the Germans held all of its debt. So, transactional money flows can be found in US retirees, hedge funds, money markets, etc. benefits U.S. citizens while sitting. This is more important than it seems. The main beneficiary of our debt payments is the recycling of US Debt service payments largely within the US economy. That is, when the government pays interest or repays the principal balance, most of them stay in our country, recycled into our economy. Despite the rhetoric, China has ~5.5% of our debt and they are not going to stop buying it. soon…. they can’t. Despite the handshake, China still needs to buy as much US debt as it needs to sell. The mechanism by which this works will likely be an independent issue. However, the basic my sweet love baby lly – China has a big problem. Its cities attract about 15 mm of people from the countryside each year. If these immigrants can’t afford to live in cities and find jobs, China will experience another revolution (btw, this will only get worse for them thanks to the increased representation of men in their country. The “one child” policy. But, I’m getting off topic… China’s strategy (and that’s a good one). But if they stop finding US debt, we won’t have money to buy their exports. THE BEST WAY TO REDUCED THE DEFICIT IS TO SPEND MORE MONEY (REALLY!) The best way to reduce our debt is through spending that stimulates the economy. even though our usual borrowing rate was negative – investors were offering their money at such low interest rates that the inflation rate was higher.) Trump promised a massive infrastructure plan but decided it would be better to cut taxes for the richest Americans and then have enough money pretend it’s not. If you’re a country, how are you going to “pay off” your debt. Well, you don’t have to. You can grow it (as we did with WWII debt and started doing it in the 1990s). But the problem is, you have to see the rich pay their fair share…. So, we’re having a “debt crisis”, how do you scale your way out of it? Ironically, you are increasing your debt balance. INVESTING IN INFRASTRUCTURE IS THE BEST WAY TO SPEND MONEY… BUT, IT IS NOT THAT GOOD IF YOU ARE NOT RICH AND WANT TO PLAY MONEY. district. Better roads, energy distribution, schools, etc. In addition to its natural benefits, infrastructure spending creates jobs and supports businesses. However, if you already have a lot of money and don’t want to work hard or innovate, you’re going to get worse. And that’s all it is. The debt crisis is a fabrication supported by mercenary interests whose primary purpose is to protect their wealth rather than support our country.
(15 People Like) A Heartache At Home In Every Dream (1973), falling in love with a inflatable doll?
You are listening to the lyrics. She says how she swells the baby and feels the vinyl of the skin. The tone is erotic for a lifeless woman. This is exactly what you think is Nathalie. Unfortunately, it’s erotic and intriguing enough. I see the objection. Thanks for the question, Nathalie. i need to hear this song more
(55 Likes) Will population growth slow down (removing the desire to find real partners) as better VR adult media/realistic sex dolls arrive in the future?
very large) then really the limit is the sky. All technologies tend to evolve at an ever-increasing rate like the snowball effect, so I would expect a faster rate of development over the next four years. It is possible that cost is a limiting factor, there may be an upper limit to what people will spend on a sex doll, but still not. I realized that the real doll is now available in a wider range of models, at a wider price range. The highest cost models are amazing, if it wasn’t for the pattern stitching you would struggle to see if they weren’t real, at least in a still picture. It seems that some kind of voice acting and animatronic movement will be factors to be developed in the next phase. I could also see the actual doll company with some kind of built-in heating unit, it seems like a pretty simple idea to me and I’m surprised this hasn’t been done before. Also, users often put their babies in chairs, etc. the need to warm them in a bed with an electric blanket should be pretty limiting, as they keep them in balance. But then, maybe once the baby warms up it can stay warm for a while? It interests you to know. Anyway, I think in 20 years sex dolls will be hot like a real person and they will be able to talk, act and react. They’ll probably also be able to pass all bodily fluids, urine, blood, tears, saliva, semen (remember they have real baby boys), sweat, milk, vaginal secretions, shit, (did I forget something?) be it what they do now. I have to think they’re going to work out this worrisome pattern stitching too, but I’ll be sad when it’s gone, the most interesting thing about dolls is their real/unreal excitement. I guess the ability for a baby to orgasm convincingly for both sexes would be such a sexy thing.
(52 Likes) Can we be captured if we don’t see a real Annabelle doll or any demonic identity and apologize?
It’s unlikely that a baby will have you in the first place…but in today’s testing times the possibility cannot be totally ruled out..as if anything can happen.(in the covid19 scenario) you have to believe in yourself or someone else will have you and you don’t even know it…in other words …try to avoid believing in insects
(69 Likes) Are there lesbian couples who would agree to a polygamous marriage with a heterosexual man?
Biology and we’ve been married twice for a long time, I understand the woman and her biological needs, I have the utmost respect for our woman by saying that everything is fine. What I do know is that they are guided and controlled by their hormones and monthly cycles. Biologically, women are tightly bound to have multiple male girlfriends, whether it’s a relationship, interest in their doctor, or a romance with a good girlfriend, but that’s a simple alternative to society labeling her a slut because she’s with more people. He likes to have intercourse. there is multiple male Sperm competition and men don’t realize their partner has semen in their ovaries and this is normal, also something we all care about. even when someone else is open, the flirtatious man calls and worries at all costs, then he can’t respect that he made a commitment. I do not hold a woman responsible for this choice based on biological needs, and a man should respect and not share his wife in the same way because he knows better.
